Sulfonamide antibiotics, commonly known as sulfa drugs, are synthetic antimicrobial agents that inhibit bacterial growth by blocking folic acid synthesis.
These drugs, effective against a range of bacteria, fungi, and protozoa, have been used for decades to treat infections such as urinary tract infections and soft tissue infections, and for prophylaxis in HIV/AIDS patients.
However, the widespread use of sulfonamides has led to significant bacterial resistance, primarily through the acquisition of sulfonamide resistance genes (sul ARGs) and mutations in the bacterial dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) gene.
These sul genes (sul1, sul2, sul3, and sul4) encode for modified DHPS enzymes that retain their function but are insensitive to sulfonamides.
Advanced water treatment processes can reduce the prevalence of these ARGs, but residual genes often remain, highlighting the need for improved treatment methods to combat the persistent issue of antimicrobial resistance.
Sulfonamides, also known as sulfa drugs, are synthetic antimicrobial drugs containing the -SO2NH2 or -SO2NH- group [6.].
They act by competitively inhibiting folic acid synthesis in microorganisms, thereby preventing bacterial growth [6., 9.].
Mechanistically, sulfonamides are structural analogs of para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) and inhibit the enzyme dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), crucial for folic acid synthesis. This inhibition prevents bacterial DNA synthesis [3.].
Sulfonamides are effective against many gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, some fungi, and certain protozoa [10]. They are commonly used to treat urinary tract infections, soft tissue infections, and as prophylaxis in HIV/AIDS patients [8., 10.].
Sulfonamides are also widely used in veterinary medicine, including in livestock, in farm animal feed, and in fish cultures for prophylactic and therapeutic purposes [6.].
Despite being in use for over 70 years, sulfonamides remain important in treating several conditions [9.]. However, their application is limited by bacterial resistance and side effects, which can range from mild rashes to severe reactions like Stevens-Johnson syndrome [6., 8., 9.].
Common uses include:
Common Sulfonamide Drugs include:
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim, commonly known as Bactrim, is one of the most widely used sulfonamide drugs [8.].
Sulfa drug resistance has significantly limited the clinical usefulness of these antimicrobial agents. Resistance is widespread in both human and animal populations, leading to the replacement of sulfa drugs by other semi-synthetic antibiotics, particularly in human medicine.
This resistance emerges due to the ability of bacteria to adapt through endogenous vertical evolution, where spontaneous mutations occur within the bacterial genome, and exogenous horizontal evolution, where resistance genes are transferred between non-related bacteria.
Notable examples include resistance genes found in soil around poultry farms and in clinical isolates.
In some cases, specific mutations in bacterial genes reduce the affinity of bacterial enzymes for sulfonamides, leading to decreased drug efficacy.
Despite these challenges, sulfa drugs remain valuable in third-world countries where access to alternative treatments may be limited.
The persistent problem of resistance underscores the need for ongoing research and development of new and effective antimicrobial agents.
Sulfonamides are synthetic antimicrobial agents that inhibit the synthesis of folic acid, an essential nutrient for bacterial growth and survival. They act by competitively inhibiting the enzyme dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), which catalyzes a key step in the folic acid biosynthesis pathway.
Bacteria can acquire sul genes, which encode for sulfonamide-insensitive DHPS enzymes, distinct from the native DHPS.
These enzymes (Sul1, Sul2, Sul3, and Sul4) feature structural modifications, particularly in the pABA-interaction region. This reorganization allows these enzymes to discriminate against sulfonamides while retaining pABA binding.
A critical Phe-Gly sequence in the Sul enzymes' active site is necessary for broad resistance, enabling the enzymes to avoid binding sulfonamides effectively.
In addition to the acquisition of sul genes, resistance occurs through mutations in the bacterial dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) gene (folP), leading to amino acid substitutions in the enzyme.
These mutations alter the enzyme's active site, reducing its affinity for sulfonamides while maintaining its ability to bind to its natural substrate, para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA).
The altered DHPS enzymes increase the Michaelis constant (KM) for sulfonamides, thereby conferring resistance.
Sulfonamide resistance genes (ARGs) pose significant challenges in clinical and environmental settings.
These genes can lead to treatment failures and contribute to the spread of multidrug-resistant pathogens [12.].
ARGs have been detected in various environmental matrices, including drinking water treatment systems, raising concerns about potential human health impacts [4.].
The dissemination of ARGs is facilitated by horizontal gene transfer, often associated with mobile genetic elements like plasmids and integrons [12.].
Aquatic environments, frequently impacted by anthropogenic activities, provide ideal settings for the acquisition and spread of antibiotic resistance [5.].
While advanced water treatment processes show higher removal efficiency for sulfonamides compared to conventional methods, residual ARGs can still persist in finished water [4.].
The presence of ARGs in the environment highlights the need for improved strategies to control their dissemination and mitigate potential risks to human and ecological health [7.].
Sulfonamide resistance genes (ARGs) are increasingly tested to ensure eradication of infections. Laboratory companies can use antibiotic resistance gene testing to help clinicians improve treatment plans and clinical outcomes from a variety of samples, including blood, urine, wound exudate, and stool.
For example, one company utilizes antibiotic resistance testing in stool samples to guide clinicians toward the optimal treatments for gastrointestinal infections; click here to learn more about that test.
Proper sample collection and preparation are essential for reliable laboratory testing of sulfonamide resistance genes. Clinical samples, such as blood, urine, stool, or wound swabs, should be collected following standard protocols to ensure sample integrity and minimize the risk of contamination.
It is essential to contact the ordering provider prior to sample collection to determine whether special preparation is required.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays are widely used for the targeted detection and quantification of specific sulfonamide resistance genes.
These assays rely on the amplification of gene-specific DNA sequences using primers designed to target the resistance genes of interest.
Conventional PCR, real-time PCR, and multiplex PCR are commonly employed techniques, each with its advantages and limitations in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and throughput.
Click here to compare testing options and order tests for antibiotic resistance genes.
[1.] DynaMedex. Dynamedex.com. Published 2024. Accessed August 7, 2024. https://www.dynamedex.com/drug-monograph/sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim
[2.] Gleckman R, Alvarez S, Joubert DW. Drug therapy reviews: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 1979;36(7):893-906. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/36.7.893
[3.] Hassanein MM. Sulfonamides: far from obsolete. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2019;6(6):2740. doi:https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20194768
[4.] Hu Y, Jiang L, Zhang T, Jin L, Han Q, Zhang D, Lin K, Cui C. Occurrence and removal of sulfonamide antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in conventional and advanced drinking water treatment processes. J Hazard Mater. 2018 Oct 15;360:364-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 7. PMID: 30130695.
[5.] Marti E, Variatza E, Balcazar JL. The role of aquatic ecosystems as reservoirs of antibiotic resistance. Trends in Microbiology. 2014;22(1):36-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.001
[6.] Ovung A, Bhattacharyya J. Sulfonamide drugs: structure, antibacterial property, toxicity, and biophysical interactions. Biophys Rev. 2021 Mar 29;13(2):259-272. doi:
10.1007/s12551-021-00795-9. PMID: 33936318; PMCID: PMC8046889.
[7.] Sharma VK, Johnson N, Cizmas L, McDonald TJ, Kim H. A review of the influence of treatment strategies on antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes. Chemosphere. 2016;150:702-714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.084
[8.] Staffieri P. Cross-reactivity of Sulfonamide Antibiotics With Common Sulfa Medications. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2020;16(2):161-162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2019.09.014
[9.] Tacic A, Nikolic V, Nikolic L, Savic I. Antimicrobial sulfonamide drugs. Advanced technologies. 2017;6(1):58-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/savteh1701058t
[10.] Tolika E, F. Samanidou V, N. Papadoyannis I. An Overview of Chromatographic Analysis of Sulfonamides in Pharmaceutical Preparations and Biological Fluids. Current Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2010;6(3):198-212. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/157341210791936803
[11.] Venkatesan M, Fruci M, Lou Ann Verellen, et al. Molecular mechanism of plasmid-borne resistance to sulfonamide antibiotics. Nature Communications. 2023;14(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39778-7
[12.] von Wintersdorff CJH, Penders J, van Niekerk JM, et al. Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Microbial Ecosystems through Horizontal Gene Transfer. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7(173). doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00173