Diphenyl phosphate (DPHP) is a urinary metabolite of triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) and other organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs), widely used in consumer products such as electronics, furniture, and cosmetics.
As human exposure to OPFRs increases, DPHP is a biomarker for recent exposure, with research suggesting potential endocrine, neurodevelopmental, and reproductive health risks.
Diphenyl phosphate (DPHP) is a urinary metabolite of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs), specifically triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) and other phenyl-containing organophosphates.
These chemicals are commonly used as flame retardants and plasticizers in consumer products such as electronics, furniture, textiles, automotive interiors, and personal care products (e.g., nail polish).
With the phase-out of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) due to toxicity concerns, OPFRs have become increasingly prevalent, leading to widespread human exposure. DPHP is a biomarker for recent exposure, as it is rapidly metabolized and excreted in urine.
New research demonstrates the potential health risks of increased exposure to chemicals such as DPHP. Potential health risks may include:
Some organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs), including triphenyl phosphate (TPHP), can cause endocrine-disrupting effects, including thyroid hormone dysregulation and reproductive hormone effects.
While this has not been confirmed, TPHP may have potential neurotoxic effects through noncholinergic mechanisms, including endocrine disruption and oxidative stress.
The CHAMACOS study, which included 537 live births, provides epidemiological evidence suggesting a potential association between prenatal TPHP (via its metabolite DPHP) exposure and lower cognitive function in children, specifically reduced Full-Scale IQ and Working Memory scores at age 7.
However, while the study identifies statistically significant correlations, it does not definitively validate a causal link between TPHP exposure and neurotoxicity, as other confounding factors and the limitations of single urine sample measurements could impact results. Further research is warranted to establish causation.
Higher maternal DPHP levels have been linked to altered gestational duration.
DPHP testing is not a routine clinical test but may be relevant for:
Occupational Monitoring: workers in plastics, electronics, automotive, furniture, firefighters, and those in nail salon industries may have higher exposure due to handling OPFR-containing materials.
Environmental Health Studies: researchers assessing population-level exposure to OPFRs, particularly in vulnerable groups such as pregnant individuals and children.
Suspected High Exposure Cases: individuals with a history suggesting significant recent exposure, especially if they also present with unexplained endocrine symptoms, metabolic or neurological changes, or suspected toxicant exposure, may benefit from DPHP testing as part of a broader toxicology panel.
Sample Type: Urine
Methodology: Isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
Sensitivity: Limit of detection (LOD) = 0.05–0.16 ng/mL
Median DPHP concentration in U.S. adults (NHANES 2013–2014): ~0.92 ng/mL
However, higher levels are noted in women (likely due to cosmetic exposure) and children (higher dust ingestion, hand-to-mouth behaviors)
Elevated DPHP levels indicate recent OPFR exposure, particularly from triphenyl phosphate (TPHP)-containing products. Research demonstrates:
92% of U.S. participants aged 6+ years had detectable DPHP levels, confirming widespread exposure.
Women had significantly higher levels, likely due to cosmetic use (e.g., nail polish). Children exhibited higher levels than adults, suggesting increased susceptibility due to dust exposure.
The ECHO study demonstrated DPHP in the urine of 99.5% of pregnant participants, highlighting near-universal exposure.
Minimal or no detectable levels of OPFR metabolites in biological samples suggest little to no recent exposure. However, the absence of high levels does not rule out chronic low-level exposure, which may still contribute to cumulative endocrine or neurological effects over time.
Given the widespread use of OPFRs in consumer products and indoor environments, background exposure is common across the general population, making it important to consider long-term, low-dose exposure when assessing potential health risks.
DPHP levels should be interpreted in context—they reflect exposure, not direct toxicity.
Higher exposure groups (women, children, occupational workers) may require further monitoring.
Reducing exposure through lifestyle modifications, such as avoiding OPFR-containing personal care products, improving indoor air quality, and minimizing dust accumulation, may help mitigate risk.
Click here to compare testing options and order testing to assess toxin levels.
Björnsdotter, M. K., Romera-García, E., Borrull, J., de Boer, J., Rubio, S., & Ballesteros-Gómez, A. (2018). Presence of diphenyl phosphate and aryl-phosphate flame retardants in indoor dust from different microenvironments in Spain and the Netherlands and estimation of human exposure. Environment International, 112, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.11.028
Huang, Y.-S., Shi, H.-Z., Huang, X., Pan, Y.-M., Wang, Y.-C., Gao, Z.-J., Jiang, P.-Y., & Yang, W.-Y. (2024). Urinary Concentrations of Organophosphate Flame-Retardant Metabolites in the US Population. JAMA Network Open, 7(9), e2435484. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35484
Jayatilaka, N. K., Restrepo, P., Williams, L., Allaire, C., Valentin-Blasini, L., & Calafat, A. M. (2016). Quantification of three chlorinated dialkyl phosphates, diphenyl phosphate, 2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoic acid, and four other organophosphates in human urine by solid phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. 409(5), 1323–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-0061-4
Oh J, Buckley JP, Li X, Gachigi KK, Kannan K, Lyu W, Ames JL, Barrett ES, Bastain TM, Breton CV, Buss C, Croen LA, Dunlop AL, Ferrara A, Ghassabian A, Herbstman JB, Hernandez-Castro I, Hertz-Picciotto I, Kahn LG, Karagas MR, Kuiper JR, McEvoy CT, Meeker JD, Morello-Frosch R, Padula AM, Romano ME, Sathyanarayana S, Schantz S, Schmidt RJ, Simhan H, Starling AP, Tylavsky FA, Volk HE, Woodruff TJ, Zhu Y, Bennett DH; program collaborators for Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes. Associations of Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardant Exposures during Pregnancy with Gestational Duration and Fetal Growth: The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Jan;132(1):17004. doi: 10.1289/EHP13182. Epub 2024 Jan 24. Erratum in: Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Apr;132(4):49003. doi: 10.1289/EHP14968. PMID: 38262621; PMCID: PMC10805613.
Ospina, M., Jayatilaka, N., Wong, L.-Y., Restrepo, P., & Calafat, A. M. (2018). Exposure to Organophosphate Flame Retardant Chemicals in the U.S. General Population: Data from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Environment International, 110, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.001
Wei, G.-L., Li, D.-Q., Zhuo, M.-N., Liao, Y.-S., Xie, Z.-Y., Guo, T.-L., Li, J.-J., Zhang, S.-Y., & Liang, Z.-Q. (2015). Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers: Sources, occurrence, toxicity and human exposure. Environmental Pollution, 196, 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.012