Research Studies
|
August 14, 2024

Optimizing Diagnostic Protocols for Cow's Milk Allergy in Infants With The Food Allergy IgE Panel

Written By
Medically Reviewed by
Updated On
September 17, 2024

Cow dairy allergies are a prevalent and often challenging condition, especially for children and their families. Understanding these allergies isn't just about reading numbers or medical termsβ€”it's about grasping the real-life impact they have. Imagine the constant vigilance required to read every food label, the frustration of avoiding favorite snacks, and the ongoing quest to find safe, nutritious alternatives.Β 

For many, this is a daily reality that shapes their diets, social interactions, and overall well-being. This article reviews a cohort study on cow dairy allergies, providing a comprehensive look at how we can better identify and manage this common allergy.

[signup]

Study Design

The study was designed as a comprehensive observational cohort study. This design was chosen to observe and analyze the diagnostic methods for cow's milk allergy (CMA) in a real-world clinical setting without manipulating any variables.Β 

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two specific IgE (sIgE) measurement methodsβ€”ImmunoCAP and IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergyβ€”in diagnosing cow's milk allergy (CMA) in infants.Β 

The study aimed to determine if these methods could improve the selection criteria for infants who should undergo the Oral Food Challenge (OFC), which is the gold standard for diagnosing food allergies but can be time-consuming and risky.Β 

Additionally, the study assessed whether detecting low levels of sIgE (down to 0.1 kU/L) could enhance the identification of allergic patients.

The study included 60 infants (27 females and 33 males) referred to the Allergy Service at Sant Joan de DΓ©u Hospital in Barcelona, Spain, for suspected CMA. The average age when symptoms started was 3.5 months, and the average age at diagnosis was 9 months.

Diagnostic Approaches Evaluated

To evaluate the presence of cow milk allergy (CMA) in the infants, several diagnostic methods were used:

  • Clinical History: Detailed histories were taken to document symptoms and possible allergic reactions.
  • Skin Prick Tests (SPT):some text
    • Performed on the forearms using extracts of total milk, Ξ±-lactalbumin, Ξ²-lactoglobulin, and casein.
    • A wheal (raised bump) larger than 3 mm was considered a positive result.
  • Specific IgE Measurements: Two methods were used to measure specific IgE antibodies in the blood:some text
    • ImmunoCAP: A result above 0.35 kU/L was considered positive.
    • IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy: Positive cutoffs were 0.1 kU/L and 0.2 kU/L.
  • Oral Food Challenge (OFC):some text
    • Conducted over three days with gradually increasing doses of milk.
    • Considered positive if any clinical symptoms appeared during the challenge.

Findings of the Study

Oral Food Challenge (OFC) Results

The Oral Food Challenge (OFC) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing cow's milk allergy (CMA). In this study, 39 children underwent the OFC, while 21 were excluded due to a high risk of anaphylaxis, high specific IgE (sIgE) levels, or lack of parental consent. Among those who underwent the OFC:

  • Positive Response: 19 children had a positive response, indicating an allergy to cow's milk.
  • Negative Response: 20 children had a negative response, indicating no allergy to cow's milk.

Skin Prick Tests (SPT) Results

The SPTs were performed using extracts of total milk, Ξ±-lactalbumin, Ξ²-lactoglobulin, and casein. The results showed:

  • Specificity: Greater than 85% for all allergens tested.
  • Sensitivity: Varied from 38% for casein to 53% for Ξ±-lactalbumin. When results for all milk allergen components were combined, the sensitivity was 63%, and specificity was 85%.

Specific IgE Measurements

Two methods for measuring sIgE were evaluated: ImmunoCAP and IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy. The findings included:

  • Agreement with OFC: The agreement between OFC results and the two in vitro methods at their respective positive cutoffs was 80% for 3gAllergy and 72% for ImmunoCAP.
  • Sensitivity and Specificity: The 3gAllergy method showed higher sensitivities compared to ImmunoCAP while maintaining specificities of β‰₯85%.

Both methods showed good agreement with the OFC results, suggesting that they can be valuable tools in the diagnostic process when used alongside clinical history and other tests.

Significance of the Findings

Improved Diagnostic Accuracy

The study demonstrated that the IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy method had higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to the ImmunoCAP method. This suggests that 3gAllergy may be more effective in identifying true positive cases of CMA, which is important for accurate diagnosis and management of the allergy.

The study also assessed the importance of detecting low levels of specific IgE (sIgE) down to 0.1 kU/L. It found that low-level detection could improve the identification of allergic patients, highlighting the clinical significance of even small amounts of sIgE in diagnosing CMA.

Clinical Implications

Although the in vitro diagnostic tools could not entirely replace the OFC, the study showed that these diagnostic methods can help healthcare providers better select patients who truly need to undergo the OFC. This helps to reduce the number of unnecessary and potentially risky challenges.Β 

This is particularly important given the time-consuming nature and potential severe reactions associated with OFC. The findings suggest that practitioners should consider both clinical history and low levels of sIgE when diagnosing CMA. This combined approach can lead to more accurate diagnoses and better management of the allergy, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

How to Order the Food Allergy IgE Panel

The Food Allergy IgE panel by Empire City Laboratories utilizes the Siemens IgE 3g Allergy method to identify specific IgE antibodies related to common food allergens. This test is instrumental in diagnosing food allergies and assists in tailoring dietary plans to avoid allergic reactions.Β 

This test, as well as others from Empire City Laboratories, are available on Rupa Health.

[signup]

Key Takeaways

  • The study found that the IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy method demonstrated higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to the ImmunoCAP method for diagnosing cow's milk allergy (CMA) in infants.
  • Detecting low levels of specific IgE (down to 0.1 kU/L) can enhance the identification of allergic patients, emphasizing the clinical importance of even small amounts of sIgE in diagnosing CMA.
  • The use of specific IgE measurement methods alongside clinical history can help healthcare providers better select patients for the Oral Food Challenge, reducing unnecessary and risky procedures while improving diagnostic accuracy and patient management.
  • This highly accurate technology is available via the Food Allergy IgE panel by Empire City Laboratories

Cow dairy allergies are a common and often challenging condition, especially for children and their families. Understanding these allergies isn't just about reading numbers or medical termsβ€”it's about grasping the real-life impact they have. Imagine the constant vigilance required to read every food label, the frustration of avoiding favorite snacks, and the ongoing quest to find safe, nutritious alternatives.Β 

For many, this is a daily reality that shapes their diets, social interactions, and overall well-being. This article reviews a cohort study on cow dairy allergies, providing a comprehensive look at how we can better identify and manage this common allergy.

[signup]

Study Design

The study was designed as a comprehensive observational cohort study. This design was chosen to observe and analyze the diagnostic methods for cow's milk allergy (CMA) in a real-world clinical setting without manipulating any variables.Β 

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two specific IgE (sIgE) measurement methodsβ€”ImmunoCAP and IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergyβ€”in diagnosing cow's milk allergy (CMA) in infants.Β 

The study aimed to determine if these methods could improve the selection criteria for infants who should undergo the Oral Food Challenge (OFC), which is considered a reliable method for diagnosing food allergies but can be time-consuming and risky.Β 

Additionally, the study assessed whether detecting low levels of sIgE (down to 0.1 kU/L) could enhance the identification of individuals with allergies.

The study included 60 infants (27 females and 33 males) referred to the Allergy Service at Sant Joan de DΓ©u Hospital in Barcelona, Spain, for suspected CMA. The average age when symptoms started was 3.5 months, and the average age at diagnosis was 9 months.

Diagnostic Approaches Evaluated

To evaluate the presence of cow milk allergy (CMA) in the infants, several diagnostic methods were used:

  • Clinical History: Detailed histories were taken to document symptoms and possible allergic reactions.
  • Skin Prick Tests (SPT):
    • Performed on the forearms using extracts of total milk, Ξ±-lactalbumin, Ξ²-lactoglobulin, and casein.
    • A wheal (raised bump) larger than 3 mm was considered a positive result.
  • Specific IgE Measurements: Two methods were used to measure specific IgE antibodies in the blood:
    • ImmunoCAP: A result above 0.35 kU/L was considered positive.
    • IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy: Positive cutoffs were 0.1 kU/L and 0.2 kU/L.
  • Oral Food Challenge (OFC):
    • Conducted over three days with gradually increasing doses of milk.
    • Considered positive if any clinical symptoms appeared during the challenge.

Findings of the Study

Oral Food Challenge (OFC) Results

The Oral Food Challenge (OFC) is considered a reliable method for diagnosing cow's milk allergy (CMA). In this study, 39 children underwent the OFC, while 21 were excluded due to a high risk of anaphylaxis, high specific IgE (sIgE) levels, or lack of parental consent. Among those who underwent the OFC:

  • Positive Response: 19 children had a positive response, indicating an allergy to cow's milk.
  • Negative Response: 20 children had a negative response, indicating no allergy to cow's milk.

Skin Prick Tests (SPT) Results

The SPTs were performed using extracts of total milk, Ξ±-lactalbumin, Ξ²-lactoglobulin, and casein. The results showed:

  • Specificity: Greater than 85% for all allergens tested.
  • Sensitivity: Varied from 38% for casein to 53% for Ξ±-lactalbumin. When results for all milk allergen components were combined, the sensitivity was 63%, and specificity was 85%.

Specific IgE Measurements

Two methods for measuring sIgE were evaluated: ImmunoCAP and IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy. The findings included:

  • Agreement with OFC: The agreement between OFC results and the two in vitro methods at their respective positive cutoffs was 80% for 3gAllergy and 72% for ImmunoCAP.
  • Sensitivity and Specificity: The 3gAllergy method showed higher sensitivities compared to ImmunoCAP while maintaining specificities of β‰₯85%.

Both methods showed good agreement with the OFC results, suggesting that they can be valuable tools in the diagnostic process when used alongside clinical history and other tests.

Significance of the Findings

Improved Diagnostic Accuracy

The study demonstrated that the IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy method had higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to the ImmunoCAP method. This suggests that 3gAllergy may be more effective in identifying true positive cases of CMA, which is important for accurate diagnosis and management of the allergy.

The study also assessed the importance of detecting low levels of specific IgE (sIgE) down to 0.1 kU/L. It found that low-level detection could improve the identification of individuals with allergies, highlighting the clinical significance of even small amounts of sIgE in diagnosing CMA.

Clinical Implications

Although the in vitro diagnostic tools could not entirely replace the OFC, the study showed that these diagnostic methods can help healthcare providers better select patients who truly need to undergo the OFC. This helps to reduce the number of unnecessary and potentially risky challenges.Β 

This is particularly important given the time-consuming nature and potential severe reactions associated with OFC. The findings suggest that practitioners should consider both clinical history and low levels of sIgE when diagnosing CMA. This combined approach can lead to more accurate diagnoses and better management of the allergy, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

How to Order the Food Allergy IgE Panel

The Food Allergy IgE panel by Empire City Laboratories utilizes the Siemens IgE 3g Allergy method to identify specific IgE antibodies related to common food allergens. This test is instrumental in diagnosing food allergies and assists in tailoring dietary plans to avoid allergic reactions.Β 

This test, as well as others from Empire City Laboratories, are available on Rupa Health.

[signup]

Key Takeaways

  • The study found that the IMMULITE 2000 3gAllergy method demonstrated higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to the ImmunoCAP method for diagnosing cow's milk allergy (CMA) in infants.
  • Detecting low levels of specific IgE (down to 0.1 kU/L) can enhance the identification of individuals with allergies, emphasizing the clinical importance of even small amounts of sIgE in diagnosing CMA.
  • The use of specific IgE measurement methods alongside clinical history can help healthcare providers better select patients for the Oral Food Challenge, reducing unnecessary and risky procedures while improving diagnostic accuracy and patient management.
  • This highly accurate technology is available via the Food Allergy IgE panel by Empire City Laboratories
The information in this article is designed for educational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for informed medical advice or care. This information should not be used to diagnose or treat any health problems or illnesses without consulting a doctor. Consult with a health care practitioner before relying on any information in this article or on this website.

Learn more

No items found.

Lab Tests in This Article

No lab tests!

Edwards, C. W., & Younus, M. A. (2020). Cow Milk Allergy. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542243/

FARE. (n.d.). Oral Food Challenge | Food Allergy Research & Education. Www.foodallergy.org. https://www.foodallergy.org/resources/oral-food-challenge

Plaza, A., De DΓ©u Hospital, J., Barcelona, & Spain. (n.d.). Diagnosis of Cow’s Milk Allergy: Are low levels of specific IgE significant? Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics International Allergy Proceedings White Paper. Retrieved August 7, 2024, from https://cdn0.scrvt.com/39b415fb07de4d9656c7b516d8e2d907/1800000000857051/fca2640859f7/Allergy_Milk_Alrgy_WP_1800000000857051.pdf

Preston, J. (2023, June 21). An integrative medicine approach to food allergies: Specialty testing and treatment options. Rupa Health. https://www.rupahealth.com/post/an-integrative-medicine-approach-to-food-allergies-specialty-testing-cross-contamination-and-treatment-options

What You Need to Know about Oral Food Challenges. (2014). Aaaai.org. https://www.aaaai.org/tools-for-the-public/conditions-library/allergies/what-do-patients-and-caregivers-need-to-know-about

Order from 30+ labs in 20 seconds (DUTCH, Mosaic, Genova & More!)
We make ordering quick and painless β€” and best of all, it's free for practitioners.

Latest Articles

View more on Research Studies
Subscribe to the magazine for expert-written articles straight to your inbox
Join the thousands of savvy readers who get root cause medicine articles written by doctors in their inbox every week!
Thanks for subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Are you a healthcare practitioner?
Thanks for subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Subscribe to the Magazine for free to keep reading!
Subscribe for free to keep reading, If you are already subscribed, enter your email address to log back in.
Thanks for subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Are you a healthcare practitioner?
Thanks for subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Trusted Source
Rupa Health
Medical Education Platform
Visit Source
Visit Source
American Cancer Society
Foundation for Cancer Research
Visit Source
Visit Source
National Library of Medicine
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of The American College of Radiology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
National Cancer Institute
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
World Health Organization (WHO)
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Pediatrics
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
CDC
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
Office of Dietary Supplements
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
National Institutes of Health
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Brain
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Rheumatology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Hepatology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Kidney International
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Annals of Surgery
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Chest
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Blood
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Gastroenterology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The American Journal of Psychiatry
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Diabetes Care
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of Clinical Investigation (JCI)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Circulation
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
JAMA Internal Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
PLOS Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Annals of Internal Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Nature Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The BMJ (British Medical Journal)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Lancet
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Pubmed
Comprehensive biomedical database
Visit Source
Visit Source
Harvard
Educational/Medical Institution
Visit Source
Visit Source
Cleveland Clinic
Educational/Medical Institution
Visit Source
Visit Source
Mayo Clinic
Educational/Medical Institution
Visit Source
Visit Source
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Johns Hopkins
Educational/Medical Institution
Visit Source
Visit Source

Hey practitioners! πŸ‘‹ Join Dr. Chris Magryta and Dr. Erik Lundquist for a comprehensive 6-week course on evaluating functional medicine labs from two perspectives: adult and pediatric. In this course, you’ll explore the convergence of lab results across different diseases and age groups, understanding how human lab values vary on a continuum influenced by age, genetics, and time. Register Here! Register Here.

Hey practitioners! πŸ‘‹ Join Dr. Terry Wahls for a 3-week bootcamp on integrating functional medicine into conventional practice, focusing on complex cases like Multiple Sclerosis. Learn to analyze labs through a functional lens, perform nutrition-focused physical exams, and develop personalized care strategies. Register Here.