A Root Cause Medicine Approach
|
December 7, 2021

A Functional Medicine Approach To Covid-19 Antibody Testing

Medically Reviewed by
Updated On
December 4, 2024

With the release of SARS-CoV2 booster vaccines and increasing questions regarding natural infection, there is renewed interest and confusion surrounding Covid-19 antibody testing. Both the research on Covid-19 antibodies and the tests continue to evolve rapidly.

Although immunity based on T and B cell memory certainly contributes durable protection against Covid-19 disease, there is evidence for a strong protective role of neutralizing serum antibodies in preventing infection and severe disease.

In one study that evaluated breakthrough infections in fully vaccinated health care workers, neutralizing antibody levels were significantly lower amongst those who had breakthrough infections compared to the uninfected control. Higher levels of neutralizing antibodies in those who did become infected also correlated with lower infectivity and symptom reports. Passive transfer of neutralizing antibodies has also been shown to prevent severe disease in multiple animal models as well as with available antibody treatments such as Regeneron.

One key question that has yet to be answered is at what antibody level can someone feel confident that they are protected from infection or severe disease. Although there is a general sense that "more is better," multiple studies have failed to define a clear cut-off point at which antibody levels can be considered protective. This lack of clarity reflects the complicated nature of our multi-layered immune system and the nuance required in assessing individual risk.

An antibody test may be a helpful piece of information in the broader assessments of someone's personalized Covid-19 risk assessment.

[signup]

Functional Medicine Labs for Covid-19 AntibodyΒ Testing

There are multiple types of Covid-19 antibody tests on the market today, and it can be difficult to know which test to order for which patient.

Rupa Health offers 3 Comprehensive Covid-19 antibody tests through USBioTek Laboratories and a Covid-19 Vaccine Immune Response Test by Elisa/ACT (discussed below).

All of these tests are slightly different, and understanding precisely what they are looking for can help practitioners choose the proper test for their patients' needs.

USBioTek uses the Elecsys test by Roche, which was one of the first antibody tests to receive FDA Emergency Use Authorization. This test uses enzyme-amplified chemiluminescence technology (CLA) designed to identify even small amounts of antibody proteins.

‍USBio Tek Covid IgG and IgM Antibody Panel:

  • ‍‍This test is best used for an unvaccinated individual who is trying to determine whether or not they have been exposed to the SARs-CoV-2 virus in the recent past.

‍This test provides both a qualitative and quantitative analysis of IgG and IgM antibodies for the SARs-CoV-2 virus. In the setting of a SARs-CoV-2 infection, IgM antibodies appear in the blood as early as 3-5 days after the onset of infection. IgG antibodies will start to appear roughly three weeks after the onset of infection.

Unfortunately, antibody tests can miss some past infections. One study found that approximately 5%-10% of individuals with documented Covid-19 infections did not develop any measurable IgG antibodies following an infection. There is also the issue of antibody count decreasing as time passes since the initial infection. We do not yet know exactly how long IgG antibodies are expected to last in response to a Covid-19 infection. One study found detectable antibody levels in some patients as far as 12 months out from infection. Still, the antibody levels dropped precipitously in the first six months, which could alter the reliability of test results. This test does not differentiate between antibodies created by a vaccine vs. an infection.

‍USBio Tek Covid Vaccination Response Screen

  • This test is designed to assess the serologic vaccine response in an individual who has not been previously infected with Covid-19.

This test provides a qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation of IgG and IgM antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain.

Our current Covid-19 vaccines create antibodies directed at the spike protein. A natural Covid-19 infection will also generate antibodies to the spike protein.

‍USBio Tek Covid Immune Response Panel

  • This test is a fantastic way to establish whether or not someone who has had a vaccine has also had exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

This test evaluates combined IgM and IgG antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and the spike protein. Our current Covid-19 vaccines create antibodies directed at the spike protein of the virus.

Natural infection creates antibodies to multiple portions of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including the nucleocapsid and the spike protein.

Since this test combines IgM and IgG antibodies, you would need to wait at least 15 days after a potential infection/exposure before drawing the blood to hit the 99% positive and negative predictive value associated with this test.

Functional Medicine Labs for Covid-19 Vaccine Immune Response

COVID Vax Panel by Elisa/ACT Biotechnologies

  • This unique test looks at the immune system's response to components of the Covid Vaccines. This test can be helpful for patients who are concerned about delayed hypersensitivity to the PEG component of the vaccine.
    ‍
  • This test does not assess the risk of an immediate allergic reaction to any vaccine components.

The COVID Vax Panel by Elisa/ACT looks for lymphocyte activation and the associated immune response to PEG, a component of the current Covid Vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna.

They use a technology called Lymphocyte Reactive Assay to see if exposing a sample of someone's lymphocytes to a chemical causes any cellular or biochemical changes in the lymphocyte.

Although this technology is relatively new within clinical medicine and is still undergoing evaluation regarding its clinical utility, early studies have shown reliability in determining whether or not a specific compound activates a lymphocyte on blind split samples.

Summary

Advising patients on their personal risk and their personalized care plan regarding COVID-19 is an active part of every practitioner's practice.

Understanding whether or not someone had a robust antibody response to a vaccine can provide valuable input.

The CDC has highlighted that we do not yet understand the "threshold of protection" value for serum antibodies and advocates for individualized risk assessments with a physician(CDC Statement).

Knowing how your patient responded to the vaccine and where their antibody levels are now can be valuable pieces of any patient's individualized risk assessment.

With the release of SARS-CoV2 booster vaccines and increasing questions regarding natural infection, there is renewed interest and confusion surrounding Covid-19 antibody testing. Both the research on Covid-19 antibodies and the tests continue to evolve rapidly.

Although immunity based on T and B cell memory may contribute to durable protection against Covid-19, there is evidence suggesting a supportive role of neutralizing serum antibodies in helping to manage infection and severe disease.

In one study that evaluated breakthrough infections in fully vaccinated health care workers, neutralizing antibody levels were observed to be lower amongst those who had breakthrough infections compared to the uninfected control. Higher levels of neutralizing antibodies in those who did become infected also correlated with lower infectivity and symptom reports. Passive transfer of neutralizing antibodies has also been shown to help manage severe disease in multiple animal models as well as with available antibody treatments such as Regeneron.

One key question that has yet to be answered is at what antibody level someone might feel more confident about their protection from infection or severe disease. Although there is a general sense that "more is better," multiple studies have not defined a clear cut-off point at which antibody levels can be considered protective. This lack of clarity reflects the complicated nature of our multi-layered immune system and the nuance required in assessing individual risk.

An antibody test may be a helpful piece of information in the broader assessments of someone's personalized Covid-19 risk assessment.

[signup]

Functional Medicine Labs for Covid-19 AntibodyΒ Testing

There are multiple types of Covid-19 antibody tests on the market today, and it can be difficult to know which test to order for which patient.

Rupa Health offers 3 Comprehensive Covid-19 antibody tests through USBioTek Laboratories and a Covid-19 Vaccine Immune Response Test by Elisa/ACT (discussed below).

All of these tests are slightly different, and understanding precisely what they are looking for can help practitioners choose the proper test for their patients' needs.

USBioTek uses the Elecsys test by Roche, which was one of the first antibody tests to receive FDA Emergency Use Authorization. This test uses enzyme-amplified chemiluminescence technology (CLA) designed to identify even small amounts of antibody proteins.

‍USBio Tek Covid IgG and IgM Antibody Panel:

  • ‍‍This test may be useful for an unvaccinated individual who is trying to determine whether or not they have been exposed to the SARs-CoV-2 virus in the recent past.

‍This test provides both a qualitative and quantitative analysis of IgG and IgM antibodies for the SARs-CoV-2 virus. In the setting of a SARs-CoV-2 infection, IgM antibodies may appear in the blood as early as 3-5 days after the onset of infection. IgG antibodies might start to appear roughly three weeks after the onset of infection.

Unfortunately, antibody tests can miss some past infections. One study found that approximately 5%-10% of individuals with documented Covid-19 infections did not develop any measurable IgG antibodies following an infection. There is also the issue of antibody count decreasing as time passes since the initial infection. We do not yet know exactly how long IgG antibodies are expected to last in response to a Covid-19 infection. One study found detectable antibody levels in some patients as far as 12 months out from infection. Still, the antibody levels dropped significantly in the first six months, which could alter the reliability of test results. This test does not differentiate between antibodies created by a vaccine vs. an infection.

‍USBio Tek Covid Vaccination Response Screen

  • This test is designed to assess the serologic vaccine response in an individual who has not been previously infected with Covid-19.

This test provides a qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation of IgG and IgM antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain.

Our current Covid-19 vaccines create antibodies directed at the spike protein. A natural Covid-19 infection will also generate antibodies to the spike protein.

‍USBio Tek Covid Immune Response Panel

  • This test may help establish whether or not someone who has had a vaccine has also had exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

This test evaluates combined IgM and IgG antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and the spike protein. Our current Covid-19 vaccines create antibodies directed at the spike protein of the virus.

Natural infection creates antibodies to multiple portions of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including the nucleocapsid and the spike protein.

Since this test combines IgM and IgG antibodies, you would need to wait at least 15 days after a potential infection/exposure before drawing the blood to achieve the 99% positive and negative predictive value associated with this test.

Functional Medicine Labs for Covid-19 Vaccine Immune Response

COVID Vax Panel by Elisa/ACT Biotechnologies

  • This unique test looks at the immune system's response to components of the Covid Vaccines. This test can be helpful for patients who are concerned about delayed hypersensitivity to the PEG component of the vaccine.
    ‍
  • This test does not assess the risk of an immediate allergic reaction to any vaccine components.

The COVID Vax Panel by Elisa/ACT looks for lymphocyte activation and the associated immune response to PEG, a component of the current Covid Vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna.

They use a technology called Lymphocyte Reactive Assay to see if exposing a sample of someone's lymphocytes to a chemical causes any cellular or biochemical changes in the lymphocyte.

Although this technology is relatively new within clinical medicine and is still undergoing evaluation regarding its clinical utility, early studies have shown reliability in determining whether or not a specific compound activates a lymphocyte on blind split samples.

Summary

Advising patients on their personal risk and their personalized care plan regarding COVID-19 is an active part of every practitioner's practice.

Understanding whether or not someone had a robust antibody response to a vaccine can provide valuable input.

The CDC has highlighted that we do not yet understand the "threshold of protection" value for serum antibodies and advocates for individualized risk assessments with a physician(CDC Statement).

Knowing how your patient responded to the vaccine and where their antibody levels are now can be valuable pieces of any patient's individualized risk assessment.

The information in this article is designed for educational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for informed medical advice or care. This information should not be used to diagnose or treat any health problems or illnesses without consulting a doctor. Consult with a health care practitioner before relying on any information in this article or on this website.

Learn more

Lab Tests in This Article

No lab tests!
Order from 30+ labs in 20 seconds (DUTCH, Mosaic, Genova & More!)
We make ordering quick and painless β€” and best of all, it's free for practitioners.

Latest Articles

View more on A Root Cause Medicine Approach
Subscribe to the magazine for expert-written articles straight to your inbox
Join the thousands of savvy readers who get root cause medicine articles written by doctors in their inbox every week!
Thanks for subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Are you a healthcare practitioner?
Thanks for subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Subscribe to the Magazine for free to keep reading!
Subscribe for free to keep reading, If you are already subscribed, enter your email address to log back in.
Thanks for subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Are you a healthcare practitioner?
Thanks for subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Trusted Source
Rupa Health
Medical Education Platform
Visit Source
Visit Source
American Cancer Society
Foundation for Cancer Research
Visit Source
Visit Source
National Library of Medicine
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of The American College of Radiology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
National Cancer Institute
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
World Health Organization (WHO)
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Pediatrics
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
CDC
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
Office of Dietary Supplements
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
National Institutes of Health
Government Authority
Visit Source
Visit Source
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Brain
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Rheumatology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Hepatology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Kidney International
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Annals of Surgery
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Chest
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Blood
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Gastroenterology
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The American Journal of Psychiatry
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Diabetes Care
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of Clinical Investigation (JCI)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Circulation
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
JAMA Internal Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
PLOS Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Annals of Internal Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Nature Medicine
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The BMJ (British Medical Journal)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
The Lancet
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Pubmed
Comprehensive biomedical database
Visit Source
Visit Source
Harvard
Educational/Medical Institution
Visit Source
Visit Source
Cleveland Clinic
Educational/Medical Institution
Visit Source
Visit Source
Mayo Clinic
Educational/Medical Institution
Visit Source
Visit Source
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)
Peer Reviewed Journal
Visit Source
Visit Source
Johns Hopkins
Educational/Medical Institution
Visit Source
Visit Source

Hey practitioners! πŸ‘‹ Join Dr. Chris Magryta and Dr. Erik Lundquist for a comprehensive 6-week course on evaluating functional medicine labs from two perspectives: adult and pediatric. In this course, you’ll explore the convergence of lab results across different diseases and age groups, understanding how human lab values vary on a continuum influenced by age, genetics, and time. Register Here! Register Here.

Hey practitioners! πŸ‘‹ Join Dr. Terry Wahls for a 3-week bootcamp on integrating functional medicine into conventional practice, focusing on complex cases like Multiple Sclerosis. Learn to analyze labs through a functional lens, perform nutrition-focused physical exams, and develop personalized care strategies. Register Here.